TY - JOUR T1 - Effectiveness of an ergonomic intervention on the productivity of workers with upper-extremity disorders – a randomized controlled trial JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health PY - 2010/1VL - 36 IS - 1 SP - 25 EP - 33 AU - Martimo, Kari-Pekka AU - Shiri, Rahman AU - Miranda, Helena AU - Ketola, Ritva AU - Varonen, Helena AU - Viikari-Juntura, Eira M3 - doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2880 UR - https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2880 KW - ergonomic intervention KW - ergonomics KW - fear-avoidance beliefs KW - MSD KW - musculoskeletal disorder KW - presenteeism KW - productivity KW - randomized controlled trial KW - RCT KW - upper-extremity disorder KW - work style KW - worker N2 - '

'

OBJECTIVES ': 'The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an ergonomic intervention on productivity loss at work caused by upper-extremity disorders (UED).

'

'

METHODS ': 'Workers with medically verified UED were invited to participate. The intervention consisted of a physician contacting the worker’s supervisor and an occupational physiotherapist conducting an ergonomic assessment at the worksite. Before and after the intervention, the employees self-assessed UED-related productivity loss (ie, decreased quality and quantity of the daily work output). We tested for differences between groups at 8 and sub­sequently 12 weeks. We also applied generalized estimating equation (GEE) to analyze repeated measures data.

'

'

RESULTS ': 'Altogether 177 employees were randomized. The overall participation rate was 88%. At baseline, 54% of the intervention group and 58% of the control group reported productivity loss. The magnitude of productivity loss was 17% and 20%, respectively. At 8 weeks, both the proportion and magnitude of productivity loss were lower in the intervention than the control group, but the differences were statistically significant only at 12 weeks (proportion 25% versus 51%, magnitude 7% versus 18%, P=0.001 for both). Using GEE analyses, we also found the differences to be statistically significant (proportion 38% versus 52%, magnitude 12% versus 18%). The intervention only benefitted employees with 0–20% loss of productivity at baseline, not those with a higher initial productivity loss.

'

'

CONCLUSIONS ': 'Early ergonomic intervention, in addition to adequate medical care, is effective in preventing and restoring self-reported productivity loss associated with UED.

SN - 0355-3140 ER -