TY - JOUR T1 - Between-occupation differences in work-related COVID-19 mitigation strategies over time: Analysis of the Virus Watch Cohort in England and Wales JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health PY - 2023/7VL - 49 IS - 5 SP - 350 EP - 362 AU - Beale, Sarah AU - Yavlinsky, Alexei AU - Hoskins, Susan AU - Nguyen, Vincent AU - Byrne, Thomas AU - Fong, Wing Lam Erica AU - Kovar, Jana AU - Van Tongeren, Martie AU - Aldridge, Robert W AU - Hayward, Andrew AU - The Virus WatchM3 - doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4092 UR - https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=4092 KW - between-occupation difference KW - COVID-19 KW - England KW - infection control KW - infection prevention KW - occupational health KW - occupational health KW - pandemic KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - Virus Watch KW - Wales N2 - '

'

OBJECTIVES ': 'COVID-19 mitigations have had a profound impact on workplaces, however, multisectoral comparisons of how work-related mitigations were applied are limited. This study aimed to investigate (i) occupational differences in the usage of key work-related mitigations over time and (ii) workers’ perceptions of these mitigations.

'

'

METHODS ': 'Employed/self-employed Virus Watch study participants (N=6279) responded to a mitigation-related online survey covering the periods of December 2020–February 2022. Logistic regression was used to investigate occupation- and time-related differences in the usage of work-related mitigation methods. Participants’ perceptions of mitigation methods were investigated descriptively using proportions.

'

'

RESULTS ': 'Usage of work-related mitigation methods differed between occupations and over time, likely reflecting variation in job roles, workplace environments, legislation and guidance. Healthcare workers had the highest predicted probabilities for several mitigations, including reporting frequent hand hygiene [predicted probability across all survey periods 0.61 (95% CI 0.56–0.66)] and always wearing face coverings [predicted probability range 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.75) – 0.80 (95% CI 0.76–0.84) across survey periods]. There were significant cross-occupational trends towards reduced mitigations during periods of less stringent national restrictions. The majority of participants across occupations (55–88%) agreed that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile even after the relaxation of national restrictions; agreement was lower for physical distancing (39–44%).

'

'

CONCLUSIONS ': 'While usage of work-related mitigations appeared to vary alongside stringency of national restrictions, agreement that most mitigations were reasonable and worthwhile remained substantial. Further investigation into the factors underlying between-occupational differences could assist pandemic planning and prevention of workplace COVID-19 transmission.

SN - 0355-3140 ER -