CONTENTS — volume 44, no 4, 2018

Editorial

335
Precarious employment and occupational injuries in the digital age ‒ where should we go from here?
Marucci-Wellman H

Review

341
Precarious employment and occupational accidents and injuries – a systematic review
Koranyi I, Jonsson J, Rönnblad T, Stockfelt L, Bodin T
351
Health effects of wind turbines in working environments – a scoping review
Freiberg A, Schefter C, Girbig M, Murta VC, Seidler A

Original article

370
Is perception of safety climate a relevant predictor for occupational accidents? Prospective cohort study among blue-collar workers
Ajslev JZN, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Kines P, Dyreborg J, Andersen LL
377
Enhancing the detection of injuries and near-misses among patient care staff in a large pediatric hospital
Macaluso M, Summerville LA, Tabangin ME, Daraiseh NM
385
Risk of injury after evening and night work – findings from the Danish Working Hour Database
Nielsen HB, Larsen AD, Dyreborg J, Hansen ÅM, Pompeii LA, Conway SH, Hansen J, Kolstad HA, Nabe-Nielsen K, Garde AH
394
Association of changes in work shifts and shift intensity with change in fatigue and disturbed sleep: a within-subject study
Härmä M, Karhula K, Ropponen A, Puttonen S, Koskinen A, Ojajärvi A, Hakola T, Pentti J, Oksanen T, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M
403
Night work and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a national register-based cohort study
Hammer P, Flachs E, Specht I, Pinborg A, Petersen S, Larsen A, Hougaard K, Hansen J, Hansen Å, Kolstad H, Garde A, Bonde JP
414
Quality of motivational interviewing matters: the effect on participation in health-promotion activities in a cluster randomized controlled trial
Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij TA, Robroek SJW, Nieboer D, Helmhout PH, Wery MF, Hunink M, Burdorf A
423
DNA damage and genomic instability among workers formerly and currently exposed to asbestos
Milić M, Neri M, Ceppi M, Bruzzone M, Munnia A, Ugolini D, Cristaudo A, Bonotti A, Peluso ME, Bonassi S

Short communication

432
Night shift work and breast cancer risk: what do the meta-analyses tell us?
Pahwa M, Labrèche F, Demers PA

Letter to the Editor

436
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors
Colombini D, Occhipinti E

Letters to the Editor

439
Authors' response: Letter to the Editor concerning OCRA as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors
Armstrong TJ, Burdorf A, Descatha A, Farioli A, Graf M, Horie S, Marras WS, Potvin JR, Rempel D, Spatari G, Takala E-P, Verbeek J, Violante FS