Original article

Scand J Work Environ Health 2004;30(6):477-485    pdf

doi:10.5271/sjweh.837

Job strain in relation to ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability among female nurses

by Riese H, Van Doornen LJP, Houtman ILD, De Geus EJC

Objective This study examined the effects of exposure to job strain on independent predictors of cardiovascular disease (ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability).

Methods The participants comprised a homogeneous group of 159 healthy female nurses (mean age 35.9, SD 8.5). This choice of population minimized variance attributable to gender, socioeconomic status, and work characteristics. Job demands, decision latitude, and social support were measured with the Karasek job content questionnaire, which was administered twice with an average interval of 12.2 months. The nurses’ scores for job demands and decision latitude on both occasions were used to define their job strain category. Ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability were assessed on a workday and a nonworkday.

Results No effect on the ambulatory levels of blood pressure, heart rate, or heart rate variability was found for job strain by itself or in interaction with social support. In addition, job strain was not associated with differences in short-term or long-term physiological recovery during sleep after a work- or nonworkday. High job demand was associated with higher systolic blood pressure at work and with higher dystolic blood pressure at work, but the latter association was found only when decision latitude was concurrently high, rather than low.

Conclusions High job strain among young female nurses is not associated with an unfavorable ambulatory cardiovascular profile. The robust effect of job strain on male health appears to be less apparent for women.

This article refers to the following texts of the Journal: 1998;24(5):334-343  1998;24(1):54-61
The following articles refer to this text: 2006;32(6):482-492; 2008;0 suppl 6:41-51; 2014;40(2):109-132