Original article

Scand J Work Environ Health 2010;36(1):25-33    pdf

https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2880 | Published online: 04 Dec 2009, Issue date: 00 Jan 2010

Effectiveness of an ergonomic intervention on the productivity of workers with upper-extremity disorders – a randomized controlled trial

by Martimo K-P, Shiri R, Miranda H, Ketola R, Varonen H, Viikari-Juntura E

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an ergonomic intervention on productivity loss at work caused by upper-extremity disorders (UED).

Methods Workers with medically verified UED were invited to participate. The intervention consisted of a physician contacting the worker’s supervisor and an occupational physiotherapist conducting an ergonomic assessment at the worksite. Before and after the intervention, the employees self-assessed UED-related productivity loss (ie, decreased quality and quantity of the daily work output). We tested for differences between groups at 8 and sub­sequently 12 weeks. We also applied generalized estimating equation (GEE) to analyze repeated measures data.

Results Altogether 177 employees were randomized. The overall participation rate was 88%. At baseline, 54% of the intervention group and 58% of the control group reported productivity loss. The magnitude of productivity loss was 17% and 20%, respectively. At 8 weeks, both the proportion and magnitude of productivity loss were lower in the intervention than the control group, but the differences were statistically significant only at 12 weeks (proportion 25% versus 51%, magnitude 7% versus 18%, P=0.001 for both). Using GEE analyses, we also found the differences to be statistically significant (proportion 38% versus 52%, magnitude 12% versus 18%). The intervention only benefitted employees with 0–20% loss of productivity at baseline, not those with a higher initial productivity loss.

Conclusions Early ergonomic intervention, in addition to adequate medical care, is effective in preventing and restoring self-reported productivity loss associated with UED.

This article refers to the following texts of the Journal: 2001;27 suppl 1:1-102  2003;29(2):106-116  2009;35(1):19-36  2005;31(5):367-374  2008;34(2):120-132  2009;35(4):301-308
The following articles refer to this text: 2011;37(2):120-128; 2013;39(1):37-45; 2015;41(5):491-503; 0;0 Special issue:0