Is it a viable strategy to compress the workweek of public health and social care workers into fewer, longer shifts in exchange for fewer workdays? The consequences for both the quality of work and the employee seem to be unclear.

Sustaining public health and social care services to protect public welfare requires a stable workforce. Vulnerable patients benefit from continuity of care, trust, and emotionally secure caregiver interactions. A stable workforce also brings advantages to employers, boosting productivity and reducing costs related to sickness absence and employee turnover (1). However, the growing demand for care of the elderly in OECD countries clashes with a shrinking health and care workforce, driven by factors such as early retirements by women, disability, and a shortage of newly trained professionals (2, 3). This scenario creates a self-reinforcing cycle, where fewer staff face rising burdens, leading to retention challenges.

In Norway, the municipal health and care sector faces a doctor-certified sickness absence rate of 26% (around one third is reported to be work-related), notably higher than the national average of 7% (4). The majority (60%) of long-term sickness absence is due to musculoskeletal and mental diagnoses (4). The sector is also characterized by a higher proportion of workers leaving the active workforce due to health-related diagnoses than the national average (98 versus 66 per 10 000 workers) (4). Also here, musculoskeletal and mental diagnoses dominate. Prevention strategies targeting sickness absence, early retirement, and disability pension are needed to address the workforce shortage. Turnover intention is affected by family and social responsibilities but is also affected by organizational aspects, such as workload and working time arrangements, which are modifiable (5–7).

The health and care sector operates continuously, necessitating shift work, including irregular working hours. In Norway, around 90% of employees in this sector work outside regular daytime hours (4). One type of shift work is the compressed workweek (CWW), where employees work extended daily work hours compensated by a reduced number of workdays, without increasing the total weekly work hours. In a CWW, the worker extends his or her workdays either only during the weekend or throughout the workweek (8). In offshore drilling or industrial work, for example, 12-hour shifts are common. In the USA and the UK, the healthcare sector has adopted 12-hour shifts or even longer ones as part of a 2-shift system (9). In Norwegian municipal health and care services, CWW with extended daily hours has gained attention as a potential solution to workforce stability challenges (10). However, the long-term consequences for employees remain unclear. Moreover, there is a lack of studies investigating how the consequences for employees and service users vary depending on how CWW are organized (11). Important characteristics of compressed schedules – such as shift length, break duration between and during work periods, and the combination of extended and shorter shifts – are largely unexplored. For example, a key distinction must be drawn between CWW with and without compensatory long breaks. If long and short shifts are combined to cover changing staffing needs, this approach may reduce the recovery benefits that compressed schedules are meant to provide (11).

Evidence about the consequences of CWW with long shifts remains inconclusive. On the positive side, long shifts paired with extended recovery periods may enhance work–life balance by reducing the commuting frequency and affording workers longer, consolidated periods of personal time (12–14). A Norwegian qualitative study found that long shifts in nursing homes are associated with reduced stress, greater job satisfaction, continuity of care, and lower emotional exhaustion, although it did not assess the long-term consequences thereof (15). Additional time off during the workweek has also been linked to fewer sickness absence days, a relationship likely mediated by the increased opportunities for rest and recovery (16). However, a recent study utilizing workplace-level data did not support the notion that CWW influences sickness absence (17). In the construction sector, compressed schedules appear to alleviate fatigue and time pressure, although these effects were contingent upon individual expectations (18).

The downside of long shifts is nevertheless significant, especially in high-stress, caregiving roles. Negative outcomes include increased fatigue and reduced alertness over successive shifts, particularly by the end of a third or fourth long shift (19, 20). Shifts exceeding 12 hours, but not necessarily combined with a compensatory longer break, are associated with elevated risks of safety incidents (21). Importantly, European nurses working ≥12-hour shifts reported lower care quality, more care left undone, and higher rates of burnout compared to those on 8-hour schedules (22), with limited evidence of value propositions being realized (9). A recent systematic review on the consequences of a compressed workweek concluded that findings are mixed, depending on the outcomes, shift length, and alternative schedule (11). Overall, the results indicated increased sickness absence for workers with CWW, while simultaneously reporting higher satisfaction.

Significant gaps remain before we understand how CWW affects health and disease. As summarized by Bernstrøm and colleagues (11), the consequences of a CWW are complex and depend on how a CWW is organized, the nature of outcomes it produces, for whom the outcomes are relevant, when the effects occur, as well as how a CWW combines with additional workplace exposures. These challenges align with a recent discussion paper on working hours and health (23) emphasizing the need for register-based exposure assessment, large longitudinal studies, biomarker integration, and experimental designs such as cluster-randomized trials to illuminate underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions.

Compressed work schedules are increasingly used in municipal health and care, but we lack knowledge about the consequences. Future studies are needed to fill this knowledge gap, eg, by linking employee-level data on working hours to health registries or estimating turnover and retention and by testing CWW in randomized controlled trials.

References

1. Sorensen G, Dennerlein JT, Peters SE, Sabbath EL, Kelly EL, Wagner GR. The future of research on work, safety, health and wellbeing: A guiding conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med. 2021;269:113593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113593
2. Merkus SL, Hoff R, Hasting RL, Undem K, Robroek SJW, Gran JM et al. Gender and educational differences in work participation and working years lost in Norway. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024:50(6):426-436. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4166
3. OECD, Who Cares? Attracting and Retaining Care Workers for the Elderly, in OECD Health Policy Studies. 2020: Paris.
4. STAMI NOA. National surveillance system for working environments and occupational health in Norway. 2024. https://noa.stami.no
5. Christensen JO, Knardahl S. “I’m too old for this!”: A prospective, multilevel study of job characteristics, age, and turnover intention. Front Psych. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015313
6. Yildiz B, Yildiz H, Ayaz Arda O. Relationship between work-family conflict and turnover intention in nurses: A meta‐analytic review. J Adv Nursing. 2021:77(8):3317-3330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14846
7. Blytt KM, Bjorvatn B, Moen BE, Pallesen S, Harris A, Waage S. The association between shift work disorder and turnover intention among nurses. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00928-9
8. Moland LE, Bråthen K. En ny vei mot heltidskultur. Resultater fra forprosjektering i åtte kommuner og en landsdekkende undersøkelse [A new path towards full-time culture. Results from feasibility studies in eight municipalities and a nationwide survey], 2019. https://www.fafo.no/images/pub/2019/20712.pdf
9. Dall’Ora C, Ejebu OZ, Griffiths P. Because they’re worth it? A discussion paper on the value of 12-h shifts for hospital nursing. Human Res Health. 2022;20(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00731-2
10. Fevang E, Fidjeland A, Gautun H, Lillebråten A, Sevaldson O. Turnusordninger i kommunenes helse-og omsorgstjenester-kraftig vekst i omfang av langvakter, årsturnus og fleksibel turnus [Rotation schemes in municipal health and care services - strong growth in the scope of long shifts, annual rotations and flexible rotations]. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning. 2024;10(3):1-22. https://doi.org/10.18261/tfo.10.3.1
11. Bernstrøm V, Alves D, Houkes I, Lillebråten A, Nilsen W. The consequences of a compressed workweek: a systematic literature review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2025;98:587–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-025-02153-8
12. Bambra C, Whitehead M, Sowden A, Akers J, Petticrew M. “A hard day’s night?” The effects of compressed working week interventions on the health and work-life balance of shift workers: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(9):764-77. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.067249
13. Amendola KL, Weisburd D, Hamilton EE, Jones G, Slipka M. An experimental study of compressed work schedules in policing: advantages and disadvantages of various shift lengths. J Exp Crim. 2011;7(4): 407-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-011-9135-7
14. Puttonen S Karhula K, Ropponen A, Hakola T, Sallinen M, Härmä M. Sleep, sleepiness and need for recovery of industrial employees after a change from an 8-to a 12-hour shift system. Ind Health. 2021;60(2):146-153. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0052
15. Ingstad K, Haugan G. Balancing act: exploring work-life balance among nursing home staff working long shifts. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):499. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02165-8
16. Vedaa Ø, Pallesen S, Erevik EK, Svensen E, Waage S, Bjorvatn B et al. Long working hours are inversely related to sick leave in the following 3 months: a 4-year registry study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019;92:457-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1372-x
17. Fevang E, Fidjeland A, Hauge K, Lillebø O. Effects of compressed work schedules on sickness absence. Soc Sci Med. 2025;390: 118858.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118858
18. Mühl A, Korunka C. You get what you expect: assessing the effect of a compressed work schedule on time pressure, fatigue, perceived productivity, and work-life balance. Eur J Work Org Psych. 2024;33(5):703-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2379061
19. Thompson BJ. Does work-induced fatigue accumulate across three compressed 12 hour shifts in hospital nurses and aides? PLOS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211715
20. Goffeng EM, Wagstaff A, Nordby K-C, Meland A, Goffeng LO, Skare Ø et al. Risk of fatigue among airline crew during 4 consecutive days of flight duty. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2019;90(5): 466-474. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5236.2019
21. Matre, D., et al., Safety incidents associated with extended working hours. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2021. 47(6): p. 415-424. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3958
22. Griffiths P, Dall’Ora C, Simon M, Ball J, Lindqvist R, Rafferty A-M, et al. Nurses’ shift length and overtime working in 12 European countries: the association with perceived quality of care and patient safety. Med Care. 2014;52(11):975-981. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000233
23. Härmä M, Kecklund G, Tucker P. Working hours and health - key research topics in the past and future. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024;50(4): 233-243. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4157

Key terms compressed workweek; editorial; healthcare; public health; shift work; sickness absence; social care