Discussion paper

Scand J Work Environ Health 2024;50(4):233-243    pdf

https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4157 | Published online: 18 Mar 2024, Issue date: 01 May 2024

Working hours and health – key research topics in the past and future

by Härmä M, Kecklund G, Tucker P

Objective This paper discusses the past and present highlights of working hours and health research and identifies key research needs for the future.

Method We analyzed over 220 original articles and reviews on working hours and health in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health published during the last 50 years. Key publications from other journals were also included.

Results The majority of identified articles focussed on the effects of shift and night work, with fewer studying long and reduced working hours and work time control. We observed a transition from small-scale experimental and intensive field studies to large-scale epidemiological studies utilizing precise exposure assessment, reflecting the recent emergence of register-based datasets and the development of analytic methods and alternative study designs for randomized controlled designs. The cumulative findings provide convincing evidence that shift work and long working hours, which are often associated with night work and insufficient recovery, increase the risk of poor sleep and fatigue, sickness absence, occupational injuries, and several chronic health conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. The observed risks are strongly modified by individual and work-related factors.

Conclusions Although the observed health risks of shift work and long working hours are mostly low or moderate, the widespread prevalence of exposure and the hazardousness of the many associated potential outcomes makes such working time arrangements major occupational health risks. Further research is needed to identify exposure–response associations, especially in relation to the chronic health effects, and to elucidate underlying pathways and effective personalized intervention strategies.

The Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health has published over 220 scientific articles on working time and health over the 50 years of its existence. These include original research but also around 30 reviews. Altogether, shift work and working hours were the main reported exposures in 11% of the papers published between 1975 and 2023 (1). From 1975 to 1984, shift work and working hours was the eighth most common topic in the Journal, whereas from 2015 to 2023, it has become the second most popular topic after psychosocial work environment. Working hours and health scores high in the Journal's citation rankings. For example, a review on shift work and cardiovascular diseases (2) and two reviews on long working hours and health (3, 4) are among the ten most cited reviews of the Journal’s 50 years (1).

In this paper, we discuss the past and present highlights of working hours and health research and identify some key research needs for the future. We analyzed 220 scientific articles on working hours and health published in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. Key publications on working hours and health from other journals were also considered.

Circadian rhythms in shift work

Based on animal and human studies in time-isolated “bunkers”, Franz Halberg, Jürgen Aschoff and Rütger Wever built the theoretical framework and basis of “circadian physiology” in the 1950s and 1960s. While epidemiological research on shift work and health had appeared sporadically before this, this basic research on chronobiology gave birth to the study of night and shift work as we know it today.

The first chronobiological studies among shift workers focused on the circadian variation of physiological and cognitive functions during nights shifts. Fifty years ago, a field study by Kolmodin-Hedman on 132 Swedish railway workers (5) reported that the amount of sleep during night work was significantly less than it was for day work or on days off. Body temperature and other circadian rhythms followed a day-oriented pattern indicating non-adaption to the inverse sleep-wake rhythm of night work. In another study, the circadian rhythms of male typesetters also showed only partial adaption to shift work, even after a 3-year follow-up (6). Later studies showed that even permanent night work is unlikely to result in a degree of circadian adjustment that could be regarded as sufficient adaption to night work (7).

Laboratory and field studies

Studies of circadian rhythms in shift work in naturalistic studies could not answer the practical question of how to optimize the organization of night and shift work. Based on a symposium in Dortmund, Germany, the two pioneers of shift work research, Joseph Rutenfranz and Peter Colquhoun announced: “We need much more information based on experimental studies of shift work before we can feel fully confident in advising industrial and other organizations about their own particular problems in the area.” (8) The new research questions focused on adaption to night and shift work in relation to the characteristics of the rotation systems (8, 9). The results suggested that rapidly rotating (2–3 consecutive night shifts) and clockwise-rotating shift systems (when changes from one type of shift to the next involve delaying the timing of sleep – eg, morning shifts – followed by evening shifts and then night shifts) were preferable compared to more slowly and counter-clockwise-rotating shift systems (1012).

Many studies in the 1990s focused on the effects of long work shifts. For example, an intervention study conducted over ten months showed that 12-hour shifts were linked to larger decrements in sleep length, alertness and performance, compared to 8-hour shifts (13). Later, in a rare randomized controlled trial, police officers were allocated to schedules comprising either 8-, 10- or 12-hour shifts (14). The results favored the use of 10-hour shifts over the traditional 8-hour shifts but did not favor the longer 12-hour shifts. Unlike this study, most early intervention studies on shift work and long work shifts were non-randomized before–after studies, involving the simultaneous change of two or more shift characteristics (eg, shift length and the direction of shift rotation), making it difficult to conclude on the benefits of any individual characteristic (12).

More recently, a considerable amount of shift work research has focused on recovery time between shifts, with the inter-shift interval being closely related to the direction of rotation. Forward-rotating schedules (including 12-hour shift systems) normally have ≥24 hours between successive shifts, while backward-rotating systems have more “quick returns”, ie, ≤11 hours between the shifts. In field studies, quick returns are associated with shorter sleep and higher sleepiness (15), consistent with the observed benefits of forward (clockwise) rotating shifts.

Sleep, fatigue and injuries

One of the most researched topics within the field of working time research is the role that circadian rhythms play in the regulation of sleep and fatigue in shift work. Sleep duration shows a pronounced time-of-day pattern with the shortest sleeps being those initiated during daytime. Sleep-related fatigue (which is often labelled sleepiness) also shows a circadian pattern, with elevated levels during night time and a peak in the early morning hours (16). Furthermore, fatigue increases during the acute and repeated sleep deprivation that is associated with, for example, morning and night work. [Night shifts are normally defined as shifts lasting ≥3 hours between 23:00 and 06:00 hours (17, 18), while morning, day and evening shifts are defined according to their starting times. Morning shift start typically after 06:00 but those starting 03:00–06:00 are called “early morning shifts” (19)].

In the 1980s, studies corroborated earlier findings that both night and morning work are associated with short-sleep durations, using objective sleep recording carried out in the homes of the participants. In a field study by Torsvall and coworkers (20), the shortest sleep durations (approximately 5.5 hours) were observed in connection with early morning and night work, whereas sleep duration was >2 hours longer for afternoon shifts and day work (ie, conventional “9 to 5” working days). Another such field study observed that the shortening of sleep duration during morning and night work resulted in less REM, stage 2, and somewhat less deep sleep (21). With regards to subjective sleep quality, the study by Åkerstedt et al (21) showed that in 3-shift work, the morning shift in particular was associated with disturbed sleep, as indicated by non-refreshing sleep and difficulties waking up.

One of the consequences of the sleep restriction, fatigue and sleepiness that are associated with night and shift work is the increased risk of occupational injuries. Several studies published in this Journal have observed increased risk of injuries during night work (2226) and on work days following night shifts (27). Similarly, several studies have found elevated risk of occupational injuries on evening shifts (22, 25, 27), suggesting that other work shift-related differences, like higher individual work load in addition to sleep restriction, may contribute to the increased injury risk.

The negative consequences of fatigue due to quick returns have been highlighted in several recent studies showing that injury risk increased following these short inter-shift intervals (2729). Further support for the link between shift schedule design and injuries was found in an intervention study that compared users and non-users of a shift scheduling tool that provided scheduling recommendations (26). The group that used the tool obtained longer recovery periods (eg, less quick returns, more single days off) and there was a reduction in the incidence of occupational injuries.

Individual differences in shift work tolerance

The previously mentioned study by Torsvall and colleagues (20) provided an early demonstration that night work may become more problematic with increasing age. The findings revealed that night work had a more detrimental effect on the sleep of the older workers, compared to their younger counterparts. Further evidence of age-related differences in shiftwork tolerance was provided by a simulated shift work study of postal workers sorting letters that featured physiological and behavioural measures of circadian timing and sleep (30). It showed that older age was associated with less circadian adjustment to night work over consecutive shifts, as well as with shorter day sleeps and higher sleepiness. Based on early findings such as these, countermeasures were identified to help older shiftworkers cope with shift work (31). The recommendations included enhanced work time flexibility, increased recovery time, reduction of night work, rapidly rotating schedules and intensified medical surveillance.

The most widely discussed dimension of individual difference in circadian rhythm function is diurnal preference (also variously referred to as “chronotype” or “morningness versus eveningness”). An early field study of nurses, using physiological measures of circadian timing, found that morning types had more difficulties adjusting to nightwork (32). Subsequently, several studies have shown that among shiftworkers, morning types experience poorer sleep quality, particularly in relation to night shifts, and are at greater risk of developing shiftwork-related sleep disorders (33). Diurnal preference is commonly measured by self-report questionnaire. A scale developed by Torsvall and Åkerstedt (34) sought to address problems with earlier scales around psychometric quality and usability “in the field” (ie, length).

In recent years, evidence has begun to emerge of a potential genetic contribution to shiftwork tolerance and susceptibility to shiftwork related diseases (eg 35,).

The development of epidemiological methods

The first epidemiological studies on shift work and long working hours often suffered from quality problems. The samples were insufficient for the detection of rare outcomes, and the study designs were cross-sectional, comparing shift workers to day workers who are often in higher socio-economic groups, and who experience different work characteristics and living habits. Exposure assessment was often crude, being sensitive to memory bias and giving imprecise information on the working hours patterns under study (5, 36, 37). The earlier epidemiological studies on working hours and health were also unable to take into account bias due to selection into shift work (the “healthy worker effect”), and suffered from insufficient control of confounders.

More recently, the use of registry-based working hour data based on daily pay-roll records has been a major step forward, as it provides precise information on exposure (17). It thereby reduces the risk of exposure misclassification and makes the results more relevant for formulating practical recommendations. Pay-roll records of working hours are not influenced by information bias, or attrition.

Other recent methodological developments in working hours and health research include experimental stepped-wedge pseudo-randomized trials and the use of the observational propensity score method, where data from large cohorts are clustered or matched in a way that mimics randomization (26, 38, 39). Some recent studies have employed case–crossover designs, which are essentially within-participant variations of case–control studies. These designs are most suited to situations where the effects on risks are immediate and transient, and the outcome is acute (27, 40). Longitudinal fixed-effects time-dependent modelling has also been used for the analysis of within-participant variation over time (41). The use of repeated exposure data also allows multiple baselines and adjustment for selection effects by excluding “diseased” shift workers who have switched to daywork (38).

Shift work, cardiovascular diseases and cancer

The associations between shift work and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been extensively studied, with reviews of the topic being well cited (2, 42, 43). The associations between shift work and CVD are linked to the observed excess risks for some major risk factors of CVD: obesity (44), type-II diabetes (45), and hypertension (46). Following the classic study by Knutsson et al published in 1986 in the Lancet (47), which showed that the risk of CVD increased linearly with exposure to shift work of up to 20 years, scientists have subsequently sought to repeat the finding with different cardiovascular outcomes and determine exposure–response estimates. The use of registry-based exposure data has provided further evidence of the association between shift work, and incident coronary heart disease (48, 49) and stroke (50). However, the findings remain contradictory with respect to possible exposure–response relationship for night shifts (48) (4951). This suggests that other working hour characteristics of shift work, in addition to night work, may contribute to the risk. The frequency of quick returns, which is linked to the direction and speed of shift rotation, is a strong candidate (49, 50). It should also be borne in mind that, since there are many pathways from shift work to CVD (43), simple unmoderated associations with, for example, the frequency of nights shifts, are improbable.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has twice concluded that night shift work is probably carcinogenic to humans (18). Their latest assessment in 2019 was based on strong mechanistic and sufficient animal evidence, while the epidemiological evidence in humans was judged to be limited. The epidemiological evidence was largely based on case–control studies (52) of high quality and with good exposure assessment, although evidence from cohort studies was less conclusive. The scientific community, as well as the IARC report, has repeatedly emphasized the need for better exposure assessment in all cancer studies (18, 36, 53). This requirement can be addressed relatively easily by case–control studies that assess exposure retrospectively. However, it is more problematic for prospective cohort studies, in which shift work exposure has been assessed many years previously through survey questions that do not adequately differentiate between different forms of work schedule. The newer pay-roll based cohorts have detailed shift work exposure metrics, but the short follow-up times that are currently available, and the lack of information on exposure prior to the baseline, limit their value in the investigation of the long-term health outcomes (54, 55).


Intervention studies examining countermeasures to tackle to the negative impact of shift work tend to fall into four categories: shift schedule design, controlled light exposure, behavioral and pharmacological approaches. Systematic reviews identified evidence favouring each of these, except for hypnotics in the pharmacological approaches. However, there was a lack of evidence of their effectiveness in countering the long-term health consequences of night work (56, 57).

In recent years, a key focus for research has been the importance of shift scheduling. For example, controlled intervention studies showed that fatigue is reduced in rapidly forward rotating shift schedules, as compared to slow, backward rotating schedules (58, 59). A literature review on shift scheduling, sleep and fatigue confirmed the findings related to speed and direction of rotation (12). Recently, these findings were confirmed in a large-scale longitudinal study, including more than 7700 participants (41). This study also observed increased fatigue and disturbed sleep in relation to quick returns.

The importance of designing night shift schedules according to scientifically based ergonomic principles was highlighted in a recent discussion paper (60). It was concluded that schedules that reduce circadian disruption may reduce cancer risk (particularly for female breast cancer) and that schedules that optimise sleep and reduce fatigue may reduce injury risk. Adherence to ergonomic principles of schedule design has also been shown to beneficially affect biomarkers of risk factors for ischemic heart disease (61).

Based on earlier research highlighting the key role of bright light as the main synchronizer of human circadian rhythms, many experimental studies have tested exposure to bright light to support the circadian adjustment to night work. In most cases these manipulations lead to improvements in, for example, subjective reports of sleep/wakefulness, wellbeing, and performance (36, 62, 63). However, it is notable that in one of the most well-controlled field studies (64), effects of light treatment were small and less than the effects of melatonin administration prior to bedtime. Unlike the field studies, which were largely unable to show effects on circadian timing, laboratory-based experiments simulating shift work under controlled conditions have managed to demonstrate enhanced adaption to night work (65).

Shift workers can be helped to mitigate the impact of their schedules through physical training (66) and other forms of health promotion. A field study demonstrated how a mobile app that provided tailored advice on managing sleep, fatigue and health behaviours improved fatigue and sleep outcomes among airline pilots experiencing circadian disruption as a result of working irregular flight schedules (67). A systematic review concluded that employer-led health promotion initiatives that are adapted to the needs of shift workers can be effective in supporting shift workers to lose weight and increase physical activity (68).

Work time control

Work time control (WTC) (eg, self-rostering or participatory shift scheduling) is an important means of providing employees a better fit between their working hours and personal needs. WTC refers to the employees’ control over the duration and starting and finishing times of the working day / work shifts, the distribution of work days and days off, and when to take vacation (69). During the last decades, evidence has accumulated that WTC is beneficial for work–life balance, perceived health, promoting recovery and reducing the negative effects of work stress (70, 71). WTC may also moderate the effects of overtime work and reduce the adverse health consequences of long working weeks (72). In an overview of systematic reviews, the importance of interventions in both working time arrangements and WTC were emphasized (73).

There is a large variation in levels of WTC, depending on the type of working time arrangements that are in place, but shift workers usually report substantially lower control over their daily working hours than day workers (74). One of the earliest intervention studies in this area showed that self-rostering among nurses improved subjective health and recovery (75). However, recent quasi-experimental studies found that introducing participatory working time scheduling software in shift work had very few effects on perceived well-being and self-rated health, even though WTC, unit-level sickness absence, perceived work ability and sleep length all improved (39, 76, 77). A potential explanation of the lack of effect on well-being is that enhanced WTC may result in some employees choosing to work long shifts or other “unhealthy” working time arrangements that have been associated also with increased sickness absence (78). However, the same study also found that paying attention to good shift ergonomics when using participatory shift scheduling attenuated the negative effects on sickness absence.

Long and short working hours

Our primary focus in this article up to now has been on shift and night work, reflecting the predominance of these topics within working hours research published in the Journal. However, research on the impact of long weekly working hours has also featured significantly in the journal’s history. Working long hours (eg, averaging ≥48 hours per week) prolongs exposure to physical and psychosocial stressors at work and may restrict opportunities for recovery.

There is a large body of evidence, as reflected in an early narrative review (3) and a subsequent systematic review (4), indicating that long working hours (defined in these reviews as >8 hours per day or >40 hours per week) are associated with a range of negative health outcomes that may reflect heightened stress exposure. These include depressive state, anxiety, truncated / disturbed sleep, and coronary heart disease. Another systematic review found that long working hours predicted weight gain and that they were a stronger predictor of weight-related outcomes than psychosocial factors (44). Most recently, evidence has emerged of an association between long working hours and all-cause mortality in a large, nationally representative cohort in China, with men and smokers being at the greatest risk (79).

Several studies have found that people working long hours tend to report more symptoms of psychological distress. However, they do not appear to be at greater risk of being clinically diagnosed with a common mental disorder (depression or anxiety-related disorders). A meta-analysis identified a small but significant association between long working hours (355 hours per week) and depressive symptoms, although the effect was not significant when excluding cases of “psychological distress” (80). Two large population studies in Denmark found that longer weekly working hours (>40 hours and 48 hours per week) did not predict use of either psychotropic medication or psychiatric hospital treatment (81, 82), while similar conclusions were reached in an earlier study of senior hospital doctors (83). Though much less researched, there also seems to be no evidence to date to suggest that long working hours are associated with dementia (84).

While very long weekly working hours tend to be associated with increased accident risk, moderately long weekly hours do not. A systematic review identified a tendency for weekly working hours of > 55 hours to be associated with increased risk of safety incidents, while weekly hours of 41–54 hours were not (85). A population-based study based on register data found no association between working either >40 hours per week or > 48 hours per week, and accidental injury risk (24).

The health risks of long working hours can be reduced by working less. In recent years, there has also been interest in investigating the effects of shifting from 8- to 6-hour working days or to 4-day working weeks with 8-hour days. An early article (86) based on three controlled intervention studies, showed that a switch to a 6-hour day with retained salary decreased the incidence of musculoskeletal problems in the neck and shoulders. A later RCT study showed that shortening the working week reduced the occurrence of sleep problems, stress and fatigue (87). A systematic review identified evidence of improved wellbeing (88), at least in healthcare settings. However, there is lack of studies on clinically diagnosed health outcomes, sick leave and changes in productivity. It should also be pointed that part time work, which is reduced weekly working hours without retained salary, may not always be beneficial for health. A recent longitudinal study showed a higher risk of depression for workers with 15 hours of weekly working hours compared with full time workers, although the authors conceded that selection effects could not be completely ruled out (89).

Working hours and health – what have we learned?

We have seen that the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health has a rich history of publishing working hours and health research. Over the Journal’s 50 years, there has been a transition from mostly small-scale, cross-sectional field studies to large-scale epidemiological studies utilizing precise exposure assessment. This trend reflects the emergence of large register-based datasets and the development of analytic methods and innovative study designs, such as cluster-randomized controlled trials (90), data-mining research (91), within-participant variations of case–control studies, case-crossover designs and the use of observational propensity score methods to mimic randomization (26, 38, 39). The general quality of working hours research has greatly improved. The cumulative evidence from the original studies and reviews provides convincing evidence that shift work and long working hours, which are often associated with night work and insufficient recovery, increase the risk of poor sleep and fatigue, sickness absence and occupational injuries, and several chronic health conditions like CVD and cancer. The observed risks are strongly modified by individual and work-related factors, including the characteristics of the specific working hour patterns. Although the observed health risks of night shift work and long working hours are mostly low or moderate, the widespread prevalence of exposure and the hazardousness of the many associated potential outcomes makes such demanding working hours a major occupational health risk.

Future research needs

Although we know much more about the health effects of shift work and demanding working hours today, the detailed exposure–response associations (where exposure is, for example, the number and combination of night shifts, long work shifts, quick returns, or other working time patterns) for acute, and especially chronic and rare health outcomes, are still mostly unknown. In the long run, cohort datasets that incorporate pay-roll data have the potential to clarify these exposure–response associations, especially if they are linked to adequate information on relevant confounders and mediators.

There is a need for further etiological research on potentially modifiable factors and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking demanding working hours with health disorders. Translation of the cumulative knowledge into effective countermeasures is also a necessity. To make this possible, we need large data sets (ie, larger sample sizes, multiple repeated measures, and longer exposure and follow-up periods) with good exposure assessment, along with strong study designs (92). In contrast to traditional intervention studies that are conducted at the group level, new epidemiological cohorts that include information on individual characteristics and changes in working hour patterns over time, offer the possibility to examine the impact of changes in working time arrangements at the individual level, and the development of personalized prevention strategies. In addition, the possibilities to link physiological, hormonal, genetic and immunological biomarkers to observational data may prove highly informative. The associations of demanding working hours with health often derive from a complex interaction of physiological, psychological and societal factors, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary research. Besides observational and experimental research, there is also a need for qualitative research and process evaluation of complex interventions based on the relevant guidance frameworks (93).

Lastly, we need to investigate the efficacy of implementations of health promotion practices and recommendations related to working time arrangements. Occupational health practitioners play a key role in many countries in tackling the health impact of demanding working hours. And yet there has been little systematic research to date on developing guidelines for medical surveillance (94), or for the implementation of the given recommendations (95).

We hope that these suggestions, as summarised in table 1, will guide and inspire future research in this important domain of occupational health research, and that the findings will continue to feature regularly in the pages of the Journal.

Table 1

Future research needs on working hours and health

  Research priorities Methodological needs
Cohort studies Chronic and rare health outcomes
Potentially modifiable factors and pathways
Register-based exposure assessment
Large sample sizes with repeated data and long exposure and follow-up periods
Exposure–response associations of single and combined characteristics of working hour characteristics
The use of biomarkers
Data-mining research on previously non- defined working hour patterns
Acute and chronic health outcomes
Changes in working hour characteristics, work-time control and health promotion
The development of individualized working time patterns and
combined prevention strategies
Sleep and fatigue management
Efficacy, effectiveness and implementation of countermeasures
Large samples, longer follow-ups
Cluster-randomized controlled trials
The use of observational propensity score methods to mimic randomization
Analysis of subgroups like employees with health problems
Interdisciplinary research
Process evaluation


The authors, as the current or past Associate Editors on working hours and health in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, wish to thank all the authors and referees for their excellent work during the last 50 years.



Burdorf A, Rugulies R. Fifty years of research in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. Scand J Work Environ Health 2024 Jan;50(1):3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Bøggild H, Knutsson A. Shift work, risk factors and cardiovascular disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999 Apr;25(2):85–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


van der Hulst M. Long workhours and health. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003 Jun;29(3):171–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Bannai A, Tamakoshi A. The association between long working hours and health: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014 Jan;40(1):5–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Kolmodin-Hedman B, Swensson A. Problems related to shift work. A field study of Swedish railroad workers with irregular work hours. Scand J Work Environ Health 1975 Dec;1(4):254–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Dahlgren K. Long-term adjustment of circadian rhythms to a rotating shiftwork schedule. Scand J Work Environ Health 1981 Jun;7(2):141–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Folkard S. Do permanent night workers show circadian adjustment? A review based on the endogenous melatonin rhythm. Chronobiol Int 2008 Apr;25(2):215–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Colquhoun PW, Folkard S, Knauth P, Rutenfranz J, editors. Introduction: Experimental Studies of Shiftwork. Dortmund: Springer; 1975. [CrossRef] [CrossRef]


Knauth P, Rutenfranz J, Herrmann G, Poeppl SJ. Re-entrainment of body temperature in experimental shift-work studies. Ergonomics 1978 Oct;21(10):775–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Barton J, Folkard S. Advancing versus delaying shift systems. Ergonomics 1993;36(1-3):59–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä M. Workhours in relation to work stress, recovery and health. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006 Dec;32(6):502–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Sallinen M, Kecklund G. Shift work, sleep, and sleepiness - differences between shift schedules and systems. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010 Mar;36(2):121–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Rosa RR, Bonnet MH. Performance and alertness on 8 h and 12 h rotating shifts at a natural gas utility. Ergonomics 1993 Oct;36(10):1177–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Amendola KL, Weisburd D, Hamilton EE, Jones G, Slipka M. An experimental study of compressed work schedules in policing: advantages and disadvantages of various shift lengths. J Exp Crim. 2011;7(4):407–42. [CrossRef]


Vedaa Ø, Mørland E, Larsen M, Harris A, Erevik E, Sivertsen Bet al. Sleep Detriments Associated With Quick Returns in Rotating Shift Work: A Diary Study. J Occup Environ Med 2017 Jun;59(6):522–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Åkerstedt T, Kecklund G, Gillberg M. Sleep and sleepiness in relation to stress and displaced work hours. Physiol Behav 2007 Sep;92(1-2):250–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä M, Ropponen A, Hakola T, Koskinen A, Vanttola P, Puttonen Set al. Developing register-based measures for assessment of working time patterns for epidemiologic studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015 May;41(3):268–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


IARC. Night shift work. IARC Monogr Identif Carcinog Hazards Hum: IARC; 2020:p1-371.


Garde AH, Harris A, Vedaa Ø, Bjorvatn B, Hansen J, Hansen AMet al. Working hour characteristics and schedules among nurses in three Nordic countries - a comparative study using payroll data. BMC Nurs 2019 Mar;18:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Torsvall L, Åkerstedt T, Gillberg M. Age, sleep and irregular workhours: A field study with electroencephalographic recordings, catecholamine excretion and self-ratings. Scand J Work Environ Health 1981 Sep;7(3):196–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Åkerstedt T, Kecklund G, Knutsson A. Spectral analysis of sleep electroencephalography in rotating three-shift work. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991 Oct;17(5):330–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Dembe AE, Erickson JB, Delbos RG, Banks SM. Nonstandard shift schedules and the risk of job-related injuries. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006 Jun;32(3):232–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Wong IS, McLeod CB, Demers PA. Shift work trends and risk of work injury among Canadian workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011 Jan;37(1):54–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Larsen AD, Hannerz H, Møller SV, Dyreborg J, Bonde JP, Hansen Jet al. Night work, long work weeks, and risk of accidental injuries. A register-based study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2017 Nov;43(6):578–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Nielsen HB, Larsen AD, Dyreborg J, Hansen AM, Pompeii LA, Conway SHet al. Risk of injury after evening and night work - findings from the Danish Working Hour Database. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018 Jul;44(4):385–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Shiri R, Turunen J, Karhula K, Koskinen A, Sallinen M, Ropponen Aet al. The association between the use of shift schedule evaluation tool with ergonomics recommendations and occupational injuries: A 4-year prospective cohort study among healthcare workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2023 Mar;49(2):108–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä M, Koskinen A, Sallinen M, Kubo T, Ropponen A, Lombardi DA. Characteristics of working hours and the risk of occupational injuries among hospital employees: a case-crossover study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2020 Nov;46(6):570–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Nielsen HB, Hansen ÅM, Conway SH, Dyreborg J, Hansen J, Kolstad HAet al. Short time between shifts and risk of injury among Danish hospital workers: a register-based cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2019 Mar;45(2):166–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Vedaa Ø, Harris A, Waage S, Bjorvatn B, Thun E, Buchvold HVet al. A longitudinal study on the association between quick returns and occupational accidents. Scand J Work Environ Health 2020 Nov;46(6):645–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä MI, Hakola T, Åkerstedt T, Laitinen JT. Age and adjustment to night work. Occup Environ Med 1994 Aug;51(8):568–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä MI, Ilmarinen JE. Towards the 24-hour society--new approaches for aging shift workers? Scand J Work Environ Health 1999 Dec;25(6):610–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä M, Waterhouse J, Minors D, Knauth P. Effect of masking on circadian adjustment and interindividual differences on a rapidly rotating shift schedule. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994 Feb;20(1):55–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Booker LA, Magee M, Rajaratnam SM, Sletten TL, Howard ME. Individual vulnerability to insomnia, excessive sleepiness and shift work disorder amongst healthcare shift workers. A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev 2018 Oct;41:220–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Torsvall L, Åkerstedt T. A diurnal type scale. Construction, consistency and validation in shift work. Scand J Work Environ Health 1980 Dec;6(4):283–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Chen Y, Yang L, Liang YY, He Z, Ai QH, Chen Wet al. Interaction of night shift work with polymorphism in melatonin receptor 1B gene on incident stroke. Scand J Work Environ Health 2022 Jul;48(5):372–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Costa G, Haus E, Stevens R. Shift work and cancer - considerations on rationale, mechanisms, and epidemiology. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010 Mar;36(2):163–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä M, Gustavsson P, Kolstad HA. Shift work and cardiovascular disease - do the new studies add to our knowledge? Scand J Work Environ Health 2018 May;44(3):225–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Beltagy MS, Pentti J, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M. Night work and risk of common mental disorders: analyzing observational data as a non-randomized pseudo trial. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018 Sep;44(5):512–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Shiri R, Karhula K, Turunen J, Koskinen A, Ropponen A, Ervasti Jet al. The Effect of Using Participatory Working Time Scheduling Software on Employee Well-Being and Workability: A Cohort Study Analysed as a Pseudo-Experiment. Healthcare (Basel) 2021 Oct;9(10):1385. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Larsen AD, Nielsen HB, Kirschheiner-Rasmussen J, Hansen J, Hansen ÅM, Kolstad HAet al. Night and evening shifts and risk of calling in sick within the next two days - a case-crossover study design based on day-to-day payroll data. Scand J Work Environ Health 2023 Mar;49(2):117–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä M, Karhula K, Ropponen A, Puttonen S, Koskinen A, Ojajärvi Aet al. Association of changes in work shifts and shift intensity with change in fatigue and disturbed sleep: a within-subject study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018 Jul;44(4):394–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Torquati L, Mielke GI, Brown WJ, Kolbe-Alexander T. Shift work and the risk of cardiovascular disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis including dose-response relationship. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018 May;44(3):229–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Puttonen S, Härmä M, Hublin C. Shift work and cardiovascular disease - pathways from circadian stress to morbidity. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010 Mar;36(2):96–108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Solovieva S, Lallukka T, Virtanen M, Viikari-Juntura E. Psychosocial factors at work, long work hours, and obesity: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013 May;39(3):241–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Viklund A, Andersson T, Selander J, Kader M, Albin M, Bodin Tet al. Night and shift work patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in a prospective cohort study of healthcare employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 2023 Sep;49(6):439–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Ferguson JM, Costello S, Neophytou AM, Balmes JR, Bradshaw PT, Cullen MRet al. Night and rotational work exposure within the last 12 months and risk of incident hypertension. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018;•••: [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Knutsson A, Åkerstedt T, Jonsson BG, Orth-Gomer K. Increased risk of ischaemic heart disease in shift workers. Lancet 1986 Jul;2(8498):89–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Vestergaard JM, Dalbøge A, Bonde JP, Garde AH, Hansen J, Hansen ÅMet al. Night shift work characteristics and risk of incident coronary heart disease among health care workers: national cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2023 Dec;52(6):1853–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Kader M, Selander J, Andersson T, Albin M, Bodin T, Härmä Met al. Night and shift work characteristics and incident ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation among healthcare employees - a prospective cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2022 Sep;48(7):520–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Bigert C, Kader M, Andersson T, Selander J, Bodin T, Gustavsson Pet al. Night and shift work and incidence of cerebrovascular disease - a prospective cohort study of healthcare employees in Stockholm. Scand J Work Environ Health 2022 Jan;48(1):31–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Wang D, Ruan W, Chen Z, Peng Y, Li W. Shift work and risk of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: A dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018 Aug;25(12):1293–302. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Cordina-Duverger E, Menegaux F, Popa A, Rabstein S, Harth V, Pesch Bet al. Night shift work and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of population-based case-control studies with complete work history. Eur J Epidemiol 2018 Apr;33(4):369–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Ijaz S, Verbeek J, Seidler A, Lindbohm ML, Ojajärvi A, Orsini Net al. Night-shift work and breast cancer--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013 Sep;39(5):431–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Vistisen HT, Garde AH, Frydenberg M, Christiansen P, Hansen AM, Hansen Jet al. Short-term effects of night shift work on breast cancer risk: a cohort study of payroll data. Scand J Work Environ Health 2017 Jan;43(1):59–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Gustavsson P, Bigert C, Andersson T, Kader M, Härmä M, Selander Jet al. Night work and breast cancer risk in a cohort of female healthcare employees in Stockholm, Sweden. Occup Environ Med 2023 Jul;80(7):372–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B, Magerøy N, Saksvik IB, Waage S, Moen BE. Measures to counteract the negative effects of night work. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010 Mar;36(2):109–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Neil-Sztramko SE, Pahwa M, Demers PA, Gotay CC. Health-related interventions among night shift workers: a critical review of the literature. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014 Nov;40(6):543–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


De Valck E, Quanten S, Berckmans D, Cluydts R. Simulator driving performance, subjective sleepiness and salivary cortisol in a fast-forward versus a slow-backward rotating shift system. Scand J Work Environ Health 2007 Feb;33(1):51–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Viitasalo K, Kuosma E, Laitinen J, Härmä M. Effects of shift rotation and the flexibility of a shift system on daytime alertness and cardiovascular risk factors. Scand J Work Environ Health 2008 Jun;34(3):198–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Garde AH, Begtrup L, Bjorvatn B, Bonde JP, Hansen J, Hansen ÅMet al. How to schedule night shift work in order to reduce health and safety risks. Scand J Work Environ Health 2020 Nov;46(6):557–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Bøggild H, Jeppesen HJ. Intervention in shift scheduling and changes in biomarkers of heart disease in hospital wards. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001 Apr;27(2):87–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Leppämäki S, Partonen T, Piiroinen P, Haukka J, Lönnqvist J. Timed bright-light exposure and complaints related to shift work among women. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003 Feb;29(1):22–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Yazdi Z, Jahanihashemi H, Aminian O. The effect of bright light on sleepiness among rapid-rotating 12-hour shift workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011 Jan;37(1):77–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Bjorvatn B, Stangenes K, Øyane N, Forberg K, Lowden A, Holsten Fet al. Randomized placebo-controlled field study of the effects of bright light and melatonin in adaptation to night work. Scand J Work Environ Health 2007 Jun;33(3):204–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Lammers-van der Holst HM, Wyatt JK, Horowitz TS, Wise JC, Wang W, Ronda JMet al. Efficacy of intermittent exposure to bright light for treating maladaptation to night work on a counterclockwise shift work rotation. Scand J Work Environ Health 2021 Jul;47(5):356–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Härmä MI, Ilmarinen J, Knauth P, Rutenfranz J, Hänninen O. Physical training intervention in female shift workers: II. The effects of intervention on the circadian rhythms of alertness, short-term memory, and body temperature. Ergonomics 1988 Jan;31(1):51–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


van Drongelen A, Boot CR, Hlobil H, Twisk JW, Smid T, van der Beek AJ. Evaluation of an mHealth intervention aiming to improve health-related behavior and sleep and reduce fatigue among airline pilots. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014 Nov;40(6):557–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Demou E, MacLean A, Cheripelli LJ, Hunt K, Gray CM. Group-based healthy lifestyle workplace interventions for shift workers: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018 Nov;44(6):568–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Beckers DG, Kompier MA, Kecklund G, Härmä M. Worktime control: theoretical conceptualization, current empirical knowledge, and research agenda. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012 Jul;38(4):291–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Nijp HH, Beckers DG, Geurts SA, Tucker P, Kompier MA. Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012 Jul;38(4):299–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Albrecht SC, Kecklund G, Leineweber C. The mediating effect of work-life interference on the relationship between work-time control and depressive and musculoskeletal symptoms. Scand J Work Environ Health 2020 Sep;46(5):469–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Ala-Mursula L, Vahtera J, Kouvonen A, Väänänen A, Linna A, Pentti Jet al. Long hours in paid and domestic work and subsequent sickness absence: does control over daily working hours matter? Occup Environ Med 2006 Sep;63(9):608–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Aust B, Møller JL, Nordentoft M, Frydendall KB, Bengtsen E, Jensen ABet al. How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews. Scand J Work Environ Health 2023 Jul;49(5):315–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Albrecht SC, Kecklund G, Tucker P, Leineweber C. Investigating the factorial structure and availability of work time control in a representative sample of the Swedish working population. Scand J Public Health 2016 May;44(3):320–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Garde AH, Albertsen K, Nabe-Nielsen K, Carneiro IG, Skotte J, Hansen SMet al. Implementation of self-rostering (the PRIO-project): effects on working hours, recovery, and health. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012 Jul;38(4):314–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Karhula K, Turunen J, Hakola T, Ojajärvi A, Puttonen S, Ropponen Aet al. The effects of using participatory working time scheduling software on working hour characteristics and wellbeing: A quasi-experimental study of irregular shift work. Int J Nurs Stud 2020 Dec;112:103696. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Turunen J, Karhula K, Ropponen A, Koskinen A, Hakola T, Puttonen Set al. The effects of using participatory working time scheduling software on sickness absence: A difference-in-differences study. Int J Nurs Stud 2020 Dec;112:103716. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Turunen J, Karhula K, Ropponen A, Koskinen A, Shiri R, Sallinen Met al. The Time-Varying Effect of Participatory Shift Scheduling on Working Hour Characteristics and Sickness Absence: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Hospitals. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Nov;19(22):14654. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Huang Y, Xiang Y, Zhou W, Li G, Zhao C, Zhang Det al. Long working hours and all-cause mortality in China: A 26-year follow-up study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2023 Nov;49(8):539–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Virtanen M, Jokela M, Madsen IE, Magnusson Hanson LL, Lallukka T, Nyberg ST et al. Long working hours and depressive symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies and unpublished individual participant data. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018(3):239-50. [CrossRef] [CrossRef]


Hannerz H, Albertsen K. Long working hours and use of psychotropic medicine: a follow-up study with register linkage. Scand J Work Environ Health 2016 Mar;42(2):153–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Albertsen K, Hannerz H, Nielsen ML, Garde AH. Night-shift work and psychiatric treatment. A follow-up study among employees in Denmark. Scand J Work Environ Health 2022 Apr;48(3):200–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Varma A, Marott JL, Stoltenberg CD, Wieclaw J, Kolstad HA, Bonde JP. With long hours of work, might depression then lurk? A nationwide prospective follow-up study among Danish senior medical consultants. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012 Sep;38(5):418–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Nabe-Nielsen K, Garde AH, Ishtiak-Ahmed K, Gyntelberg F, Mortensen EL, Phung TKet al. Shift work, long working hours, and later risk of dementia: A long-term follow-up of the Copenhagen Male Study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2017 Nov;43(6):569–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Matre D, Skogstad M, Sterud T, Nordby KC, Knardahl S, Christensen JOet al. Safety incidents associated with extended working hours. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 2021 Sep;47(6):415–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Wergeland EL, Veiersted B, Ingre M, Olsson B, Åkerstedt T, Bjørnskau Tet al. A shorter workday as a means of reducing the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003 Feb;29(1):27–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Schiller H, Lekander M, Rajaleid K, Hellgren C, Åkerstedt T, Barck-Holst Pet al. The impact of reduced worktime on sleep and perceived stress - a group randomized intervention study using diary data. Scand J Work Environ Health 2017 Mar;43(2):109–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Voglino G, Savatteri A, Gualano MR, Catozzi D, Rousset S, Boietti Eet al. How the reduction of working hours could influence health outcomes: a systematic review of published studies. BMJ Open 2022 Apr;12(4):e051131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Nielsen HB, Kirchheiner-Rasmussen J, Dyreborg J, Larsen AD, Madsen IE, Pedersen Jet al. Trajectories of marginal part-time work and risk of depression. Does job or income insecurity mediate the relation? Scand J Work Environ Health 2023 May;49(4):271–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Vedaa Ø, Djupedal IL, Svensen E, Waage S, Bjorvatn B, Pallesen Set al. Health-promoting work schedules: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomised controlled trial on the effects of a work schedule without quick returns on sickness absence among healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2022 Apr;12(4):e058309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Rosenström T, Härmä M, Kivimäki M, Ervasti J, Virtanen M, Hakola Tet al. Patterns of working hour characteristics and risk of sickness absence among shift-working hospital employees: a data-mining cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2021 Jul;47(5):395–403. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Tucker P. Scientific challenges of studying shift schedule design. Scand J Work Environ Health 2022 Sep;48(7):507–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JMet al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021 Sep;374(2061):n2061. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Costa G. Guidelines for the medical surveillance of shift workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1998;24(3 Suppl 3):151–5.[PubMed]


Härmä M, Shiri R, Ervasti J, Karhula K, Turunen J, Koskinen Aet al. National recommendations for shift scheduling in healthcare: A 5-year prospective cohort study on working hour characteristics. Int J Nurs Stud 2022 Oct;134:104321. [CrossRef] [PubMed]