Original article

Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39(5):456-467    pdf full text

https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3361 | Published online: 08 Apr 2013, Issue date: 01 Sep 2013

The effectiveness of a construction worksite prevention program on work ability, health, and sick leave: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial

by Oude Hengel KM, Blatter BM, van der Molen HF, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ

Objective This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a prevention program on work ability, health, and sick leave targeted at construction worksites.

Methods A total of 15 departments (N=297 workers) from 6 construction companies participated in this cluster randomized controlled trial and were randomly allocated to the intervention (8 departments; N=171 workers) or control (7 departments; N=122 workers) group. The intervention consisted of two individual training sessions with a physical therapist aimed at lowering the physical workload, a rest-break tool to improve the balance between work and recovery, and two empowerment training sessions to increase the worker’s influence at the worksite. Data on work ability, physical and mental health status, and musculoskeletal symptoms were collected at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Sick leave data were obtained from the companies.

Results Overall, no differences in work ability [β 0.02, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.34–0.37] or physical and mental health status (β -0.04, 95% CI -1.43–1.35, and β 0.80 95% CI -0.51–2.11, respectively) were found between the intervention and control group. The intervention showed an overall decline in musculoskeletal symptoms (ranging from OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34–1.33, to OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.47–1.57) and long-term sick leave (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.13–1.26) among construction workers. Both reductions were not statistically significant.

Conclusion The prevention program seemed to result in a beneficial but not statistically significant decline in the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and long-term sick leave among construction workers, but showed no effects with regard to work ability, physical health, and mental health.

The following articles refer to this text: 2013;39(5):427-429; 2018;44(2):134-146; 2020;46(2):218-227