Original article

Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32(4):270-275    pdf

https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1010 | Issue date: 31 Aug 2006

Occupational exposures and head and neck cancers among Swedish construction workers

by Purdue MP, Järvholm B, Bergdahl IA, Hayes RB, Baris D

Objectives Occupational exposures in the construction industry may increase the risk of head and neck cancers, although the epidemiologic evidence is limited by problems of low study power and inadequate adjustment for tobacco use. In an attempt to address this issue, the relationship between selected occupational exposures and head and neck cancer risk was investigated using data from a large cohort of Swedish construction workers.

Methods Altogether 510 squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (171 in the oral cavity, 112 in the pharynx, 227 in the larynx) were identified during 1971–2001 among 307 799 male workers in the Swedish construction industry. Exposure to diesel exhaust, asbestos, organic solvents, metal dust, asphalt, wood dust, stone dust, mineral wool, and cement dust was assessed using a semi-quantitative job-exposure matrix. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for head and neck cancers in relation to occupational exposure, using Poisson regression with adjustment for age and smoking status.

Results Asbestos exposure was related to an increased laryngeal cancer incidence (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.1). Excesses of pharyngeal cancer were observed among workers exposed to cement dust (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.1). No occupational exposures were associated with oral cavity cancer. These findings did not materially change upon additional adjustment for cigarette pack-years.

Conclusions These findings offer further evidence that asbestos increases the risk of laryngeal cancer. The observation of a positive association between cement dust exposure and pharyngeal cancer warrants further investigation.

This article refers to the following text of the Journal: 2001;27(4):233-239
The following articles refer to this text: 2010;36(6):509-513; 2014;40(4):420-427