Amendments and corrections2023;49(3):231-244
pdf Re: Cillekens B, Huysmans MA, Holtermann A, van Mechelen W, Straker L, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, Coenen P. Physical activity at work may not be health enhancing. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease mortality covering 23 studies with 655 892 participants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022;48(2):86–98. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3993
Review2022;48(2):86-98
pdf full text Physical activity at work may not be health enhancing. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease mortality covering 23 studies with 655 892 participants
Original article2017;43(6):526-539
pdf full text A research framework for the development and implementation of interventions preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders
Original article2016;42(6):469-480
pdf full text Effectiveness of a return-to-work program for workers without an employment contract, sick-listed due to common mental disorders
Original article2013;39(3):284-294
pdf full text Long-term effects of an occupational health guideline on employees’ body weight-related outcomes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and quality of life: results from a randomized controlled trial
Original article2013;39(1):46-56
pdf full text Economic evaluation of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders
Original article2013;39(1):66-75
pdf full text Effectiveness of a worksite lifestyle intervention on vitality, work engagement, productivity, and sick leave: results of a randomized controlled trial
Original article2010;36(6):488-498
pdf Return to work and occupational physicians’ management of common mental health problems – process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial
Review2010;36(4):273-288
pdf Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a corporate perspective – a systematic review of methodological quality
6 days to first decision for all manuscripts
55 days until first round of peer review is complete
4.1 months from submission to acceptance
15 days from acceptance to publication
SJWEH @SJWEH - 17.04.2023 Virus Watch survey of diverse worker cohort found considerable occupational & temporal variation in COVID-19 mitiga… https://t.co/nr6eZAgTsm
SJWEH @SJWEH - 14.04.2023 This DK cohort study of 30 523 employees examined the link between marginal part-time work & depression. They found… https://t.co/7stED87bRb