Author's reply2025;51(4):347-348
pdf full text Response to Drs. Igor Burstyn and George Luta’s letter: Advice on better utilization of validation data to adjust odds ratios for differential exposure misclassification (recall bias)
Letter to the Editor2025;51(4):344-346
pdf full text Advice on better utilization of validation data to adjust odds ratios for differential exposure misclassification (recall bias)
Letter to the Editor2022;48(7):586-587
pdf full text Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias
Author's reply2021;47(1):87-89
pdf full text Authors’ response: Mezei et al's "Comments on a recent case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis testis"
Letter to the Editor2021;47(1):85-86
pdf full text Comments on a recent case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis testis
Letter to the Editor2019;45(4):423-424
pdf full text Binding occupational exposure limits for carcinogens in the EU – necessary but not sufficient to reduce risk
Letter to the Editor2019;45(4):421-422
pdf full text Determining an optimal minimum number of subjects in each occupation for a job exposure matrix (JEM) using self-reported data: a missing test
Letter to the Editor2018;44(1):108-110
pdf full text Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups
We have transitioned to a new Editorial System. If you are submitting a NEW manuscript, please click on the green button below. You will be required to make a new account even if you are a former registered user.
If you need to access a review or submit a revision of a previously submitted manuscript where an editorial decision has not yet been taken, please sign into old CMS .
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Privacy policy